Personal Innovativeness, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Trust Asdeterminants of Mobile Payment Utilization

Main Article Content

Jefferson
Tommy Christian Efrata

Abstract

Because of technological advances, the role of cash as a means of payment began to shift and was eventually replaced by digital payments. Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard is one of the digital payment methods developed in Indonesia (QRIS). The goal of this study is to determine what factors influence people's intentions to use QRIS as a mobile payment in Indonesia, as measured by personal innovativeness, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and trust. Non-probability sampling was used in this study. Researchers collected data from 241 respondents by distributing questionnaires online via Google Form. The measurement scale used in this study is a linear scale. SEM-PLS is used to process data. According to the findings of this study, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and trust influence the intention of Indonesians to use QRIS, whereas personal innovativeness has no effect. As far as researchers are aware, there are still few studies that specifically discuss the phenomenon of increasing QRIS transaction volume in Indonesia in general, so this research is expected to contribute to the advancement of business and management science. The findings of this study suggest alternative strategies for mobile payment service providers in countries with similar characteristics.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jefferson, & Efrata, T. C. (2023). Personal Innovativeness, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Trust Asdeterminants of Mobile Payment Utilization. Review of Management and Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.37715/rme.v7i2.4157
Section
Articles

References

Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204

Balaka, Muh. Y. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif (I. Ahmaddien, Ed.).

Bank Indonesia. (2023). Apa Itu Elektronifikasi. https://www.bi.go.id/id/fungsi-utama/sistem-pembayaran/ritel/elektronifikasi/default.aspx

Danuri, M., Informatika, M., Teknologi, J., & Semarang, C. (2019). Perkembangan dan Transformasi Teknologi Digital. 119–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53845/infokam.v15i2.178

Daragmeh, A., Lentner, C., & Sági, J. (2021). FinTech payments in the era of COVID-19: Factors influencing behavioral intentions of “Generation X” in Hungary to use mobile payment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100574

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

de Luna, I. R., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2019). Mobile payment is not all the same: The adoption of mobile payment systems depending on the technology applied. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 931–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.018

Efrata, T. C., Radianto, W. E. D., & Nahar, F. H. (2022). Design Thinking Process In SME, Is It Still Powerful In Dealing with The Covid 19 Market Turbulence. Journal of Applied Management (JAM), 20(4), 787. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam

Ferinaldy, F., Muslikh, M., & Huda, N. (2019). Pengaruh Sikap, Norma Subjektif, Kendali Perilaku dan Religiusitas Terhadap Intensi Menggunakan Uang Elektronik. Ekspansi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, Perbankan Dan Akuntansi, 11(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.35313/ekspansi.v11i2.1531

Hu, Z., Ding, S., Li, S., Chen, L., & Yang, S. (2019). Adoption intention of fintech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended technology acceptance model. Symmetry, 11(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030340

Joan, L., & Sitinjak, T. (2019). Pengaruh Persepsi Kebermanfaatan dan Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan Terhadap Minat Penggunaan Layanan Pembayaran Digital GO-PAY. Jurnal Manajemen, 8(2), 27–39.

Kalinic, Z., Marinkovic, V., Molinillo, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2019). A multi-analytical approach to peer-to-peer mobile payment acceptance prediction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.016

Kurniawati, E. T., Zuhroh, I., & Malik, N. (2021). Literasi dan Edukasi Pembayaran Non Tunai Melalui Aplikasi QR Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) Pada Kelompok Milenial. Studi Kasus Inovasi Ekonomi, 5(1), 23–30. http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/skie

Labib, M. A. M., & Wibawa, B. M. (2019). Analisis Peta Kompetitor Industri Mobile Payment di Indonesia. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni ITS, 8(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373520.v8i1.41789

Lee, J., Ryu, M. H., & Lee, D. (2019). A study on the reciprocal relationship between user perception and retailer perception on platform-based mobile payment service. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 48, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.007

Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Japutra, A., Molinillo, S., Singh, N., & Sinha, N. (2020). Assessment of mobile technology use in the emerging market: Analyzing intention to use m-payment services in India. Telecommunications Policy, 44(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102009

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & David Schoorman, F. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/258792

Nawawi, H. H. (2020). Penggunaan E-wallet di Kalangan Mahasiswa. Jurnal Emik, 3(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46918/emik.v3i2.697

Putri, A. M. H. (2023, January 26). Jos! Transaksi QRIS Tembus Rp 63 Triliun Pada 10 Bulan 2022. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20230126094208-128-408352/jos-transaksi-qris-tembus-rp-63-triliun-pada-10-bulan-2022

Rahayu, N., Agus Supriyono, I., & Mulyawan, E. (2023). Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia Dengan Tantangan Transformasi Digital. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 4(1), 92–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34306/abdi.v4i1.823

Rahman, M., Ismail, I., & Bahri, S. (2020). Analysing consumer adoption of cashless payment in Malaysia. Digital Business, 1(1), 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100004

Rijatullah, R., Suroso, A., & Rujito, L. (2020). Pengaruh Kemanfaatan dan Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan Terhadap Sikap Penggunaan Resep Elektronik. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi (JEBA), 22(2), 217–232.

Saputri, O. B. (2020). Preferensi konsumen dalam menggunakan quick response code indonesia standard (qris) sebagai alat pembayaran digital. Kinerja, 17(2), 237–247. http://journal.feb.unmul.ac.id/index.php/KINERJA

Shankar, A., & Datta, B. (2018). Factors Affecting Mobile Payment Adoption Intention: An Indian Perspective. Global Business Review, 19(3S), S72–S89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918757870

Singh, N., & Sinha, N. (2020). How perceived trust mediates merchant’s intention to use a mobile wallet technology. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101894

Susilo, A. Z., Iksan Prabowo, M., Taman, A., Pustikaningsih, A., & Samlawi, A. (2019). A comparative study of factors affecting user acceptance of go-pay and OVO as a feature of Fintech application. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 876–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.195

Tarantang, J., Awwaliyah, A., Astuti, M., & Munawaroh, M. (2019). Perkembangan Sistem Pembayaran Digital pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 di Indonesia. Jurnal Al Qardh, 4(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23971/jaq.v4i1.1442

Türker, C., Altay, B. C., & Okumuş, A. (2022). Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121968

Umaningsih, W. P., & Wardani, D. K. (2020). Pengaruh Persepsi Kemudahan, Fitur Layanan, dan Keamanan Terhadap Niat Menggunakan E-Money. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomi, 5(3), 113–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29407/jae.v5i3.14057