Semiotic Analysis of Political Symbolism in Shi Lifeng's 'The Puppet Player'

Main Article Content

Aditya Aditama Putri Hikmatyar
Harun Fadhiilah

Abstract

This study explores how Shi Lifeng’s painting The Puppet Player constructs and communicates political narratives through visual symbolism. Despite the frequent use of Mao Zedong’s imagery in Chinese contemporary art, limited research examines how Lifeng’s visual language functions as a political statement. Using Roland Barthes’ semiotic framework—denotation, connotation, and myth—this qualitative study analyzes color, spatial composition, object symbolism, and figure gestures in the artwork. The analysis reveals that dominant red hues, hierarchical composition, and theatrical staging signify ideological control and social struggle. These visual strategies expose how authority and manipulation are normalized through aesthetic codes. The findings highlight Lifeng’s critical stance toward power structures and his use of design principles to challenge political memory. This research contributes to the discourse of visual communication by demonstrating how semiotic analysis can decode layered meanings in politically charged imagery, offering insights for designers and researchers in understanding symbolism and narrative construction within visual art.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hikmatyar, A. A. P., & Fadhiilah, H. (2025). Semiotic Analysis of Political Symbolism in Shi Lifeng’s ’The Puppet Player’. VCD, 10(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.37715/vcd.v10i2.4987
Section
Articles

References

Andrews, J. F. (1994). Painters and politics in the People’s Republic of China, 1949-1979. Univ of California Press.

Bao, H. (2020). Queer China: Lesbian and gay literature and visual culture under postsocialism. Routledge India. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003027898

Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text (S. Heath, Ed.). Fontana.

Chen, S., & Chu, Y. (2022). A Study of the cultural significance of traditional colors in Chinese movies. Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2022), 1362–1368. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-31-2_161

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2017). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153

Dong, Q. (2023). Culture of the Chinese revolution: Symbolic and semiotic differences from the world culture of revolution. International Journal of Asian Studies, 20(2), 851–873. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479591423000141

Duan, L. (2021). Meta-art history: Introduction to a narratological study of art history. Signs and Media, 1(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1163/25900323-12340008

Gladston, P., & Hill, K. (2014). Contemporary Chinese art and criticality: From the general to the particular. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 11(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1386/jvap.11.2-3.99_2

Gramsci, A. (1992). Selections from the prison notebooks (1st ed.). International Publishers.

Hung, C. (2011). Mao’s new world: Political culture in the early People’s Republic. Cornell University Press.

Langefeld, M. L. (2023). Cut, copy, paste: Yu Youhan and the refashioning of China’s past. Arts, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13010003

Li, D., & Dechsubha, T. (2023). The representation and symbolic significance of black in traditional Chinese colors. Kurdish Studies, 11(2), 2340–2349. https://doi.org/10.58262/ks.v11i02.167

Magnusson, P., & Godhe, A.-L. (2019). Multimodality in language education – Implications for teaching. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.127

Pelkey, J. (2020). Researching visual semiotics online. TECCOGS: Revista Digital de Tecnologias Cognitivas, 21. https://doi.org/10.23925/1984-3585.2020i21p116-145

Ravenel International Art Group. (2018). Shi Lifeng 石立峰. Ravenel Artist Biographies. https://ravenel.com/cata/artistIn1/b6ee6224-f4a6-4c0e-97bb-a782a531dc33

Riaz, M. (2024). Comparative semiotics of womanhood: Portrayal of Chinese and Pakistani women in contemporary paintings. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 20(4), 597–624. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2024-2029

Tan, C. (2012). Art for/of the masses. Third Text, 26(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2012.663974

Vecco, M., Chang, S., & Srakar, A. (2016). La topographie changeante de l’art contemporain en Chine continentale. Géographie et Cultures, 97, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.4000/gc.4405

Wang, M. (2019). Power, capital, and artistic freedom: Contemporary Chinese art communities and the city. Cultural Studies, 33(4), 657–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2018.1497675

Wood, D. (2017). A semiotic Rosetta Stone: Developing a designer-centric meta-language of pragmatic semiotics. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S28–S37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353006

Yu, H., Zhang, H., & Liu, W. (2025). Visual metaphors in current Chinese ideological promotion: A multimodal analysis of public service advertisements. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2480883

Zeng, L., & Zhu, X. (2024). Constructing cultural identities through new media: A multimodal appraisal analysis of Chinese web-based ink and wash cartoons. Semiotica, 2024(259), 217–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2022-0098

Zhang, H., & Wei, Y. (2024). Visual frames in promotional video: A semiotic analysis of “What is Peppa?” Semiotica, 2024(257), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2022-0006

Zhang, J. (2025). The manifestation of semiotics in oil painting creation. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 19(1), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.54097/e1s4ap34