Redefinisi Perancah : Potensi Arsitektur Temporer pada Keberlanjutan Redefining Scaffolding: The Potential of Temporary Architecture in Sustainability
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the potential of scaffolding-based temporary architectural design within the framework of sustainable architecture. Traditionally utilized as a temporary structural element to facilitate construction processes, scaffolding has increasingly evolved into a central component in spatial formation across diverse design contexts. Employing a qualitative case study methodology with research about design approach, this research examines architectural typologies in Indonesia that utilize scaffolding as a fundamental element. The selected case studies span various project scales, encompassing both private and public functions and ranging from small to medium-sized developments. The primary aim of this study is to demonstrate how temporary structural elements can be reimagined as core components in spatial formation, presenting possibilities across various architectural applications. The reflections derived from this investigation are articulated as concepts and ideas that showcase how the temporality of architecture and structural elements can enhance sustainability in design. This study underscores the attributes of flexibility, adaptability, efficiency, and temporality in spaces and buildings formed through scaffolding-based designs. The findings reveal that innovative and creative applications of temporary structural elements as spatial formers hold considerable potential to advance sustainability in architectural discourse. The multifunctionality of such elements paves the way for more exploratory and unconventional design approaches. Additionally, this research highlights that scaffolding, when applied as a primary architectural element, can align with sustainability principles by enabling the creation of efficient, temporary spaces that are both adaptable and flexible. As a result, this study provides valuable insights for practitioners and academics seeking to develop innovative and sustainable approaches in architectural design
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abdel, H. (2020). St. Carolus Hospital Screening Facility / AT-LARS Save this picture! Archdaily. https://www.archdaily.com/947140/st-
carolus-hospital-screening-facility-at-lars
Akanoma, S. (2021). Rumah Besi Putih. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/akanoma.studio/p/CXA_IUnPbLi
Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford university press.
Andu, F. A. (2019). Kajian Perancah Ditinjau dari Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja. Jurnal Ilmiah Media Engineering, 9(1).
Arisya, K. F., & Suryantini, R. (2021). Modularity in design for disassembly (DfD): exploring the strategy for a better sustainable architecture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 738(1), 12024.
Cohen, J.-L. (2018). Ludwig Mies van der Rohe: Third and updated edition. Birkhäuser.
Combes, L., & Bellomio, A. (1999). Creativity and modularity in architecture. This Book Is Published By, 160.
Damayanti, R., & Redyantanu, B. P. (2022). PENELURUSAN RUANG KORIDOR KOTA DALAM PRODUKSI RUANG SOSIAL TEMPORAL. LANGKAU BETANG: JURNAL ARSITEKTUR, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26418/lantang.v9i1.47672
Dharmawan, C., & Alviano, M. (2019). Pre-fabricated Material for Modular House. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 662(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/662/4/042020
Frampton, K. (2001). Studies in tectonic culture: the poetics of construction in nineteenth and twentieth century architecture. Mit Press.
Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=0jADDQAAQBAJ
Gusthia, I. (2024). Mengenal Tentang Scaffolding Peran dalam Konstruksi Bangunan. Garuda Systrain Interindo. https://www.garudasystrain.co.id/mengenal-tentang-scaffolding-peran-dalam-konstruksi-bangunan/
Hayati, D. K., & Kusnaedi, I. (2024). PENERAPAN KONSEP MODULAR DENGAN GAYA INDUSTRIAL DI GALERI KOPI EKOWISATA MANGLAYANG BANDUNG. Aksen: Journal of Design and Creative Industry, 9(1).
Lee, J., Son, J., Jeong, W., & Yi, J.-S. (2015). An Economic Feasibility Analysis on the Movable Modular Lodging Buildings. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 16(5), 12–20.
Lehtonen, T. (2007). Designing modular product architecture in the new product development. Tampere University of Technology.
Lucas, R. (2016). Research methods for architecture. Hachette UK.
Mamahit, B., Kushartomo, W., & Prabowo, A. (2023). Penilaian Penggunaan Perancah bagi Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja. JMTS: Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil.
Nasir, D. J. (2022). Aesthetically Enjoyable “Under Our Hill” Installation Encapsulates Critical Information on Jakarta’s Waste Issues.
Persohn, L. (2021). Curation as methodology. Qualitative Research, 21(1), 20–41.
Plowright, P. (2014). Revealing architectural design : methods, frameworks and tools. Routledge.
Prayitno, B. (2018). Green Modular Concept of Sustainable Kampong Cityblock in Indonesia. Sustainable Development Research in the Asia-Pacific Region: Education, Cities, Infrastructure and Buildings, 509–523.
Rafik, A., & Cahyani, R. F. (2018). Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Penggunaan Perancah Kayu Galam Dan Perancah Besi (Scaffolding). Jurnal Gradasi Teknik Sipil, 2(1), 20–32.
Redyantanu, B. P., & Damayanti, R. (2017). TEMPORALITY IN A DISCUSSION OF SUSTAINABLE ARCHITECTURE. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 44(2), 163–170.
Respati, R., Wardah, S., & Akbar, R. Z. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Penggunaan Perancah Kayu dan Penyewaan Scaffolding. Density (Development Engineering of University) Journal, 6(1), 1–10.
Sassi, P. (2006). Strategies for sustainable architecture. Taylor & Francis.
Schön. (1983). The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Silva, M. F. (2020). Another way of living: The Prefabrication and modularity toward circularity in the architecture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588(4), 42048.
Smith, R. E. (2010). Prefab architecture: A guide to modular design and construction. John Wiley & Sons.
Sosa, M., Ahmad, L., & Musfy, K. (2022). Adaptive Ephemeral Interiority: Upcycling Site Specific Interiors. Interiority, 5(2), 155.
Suharyani, S., & Fathonah, M. N. (2019). Identifikas Material Scaffolding sebagai Alternatif Tempat Tinggal untuk Kalangan Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah (MBR) Studi kasus di Akanoma Studio. Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur, 15(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v15i1.8993
Till, J. (2012). Is doing architecture doing research? 4IAU 4a Jornadas Internacionales Sobre Investigación …, 1–9.
Verbeke, J. (2013). This is research by design. In Design research in architecture (pp. 137–160). Routledge.
Wallance, D. (2021). The future of modular architecture. Routledge.
Yasin, N. (2020). Kekuatan Dan Kebutuhan Perancah Bingkai/Frame Scaffold Pada Konstruksi Gedung. Jurnal Ilmiah Desain & Konstruksi, 18(2), 212–218.
Yatmo, Y. A., Atmodiwirjo, P., Saginatari, D. P., & Harahap, M. M. Y. (2020). Development of modular school design as a permanent solution for post-disaster reconstruction in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment.